21PacketsContact Us
Energy

Remote site continuity · Architecture

Map the service path for remote site continuity.

Maintain protected service relationships through access-link degradation, congestion, and localized underlay failures.

remote Endlet → protected DEFT service relationship → continuously evaluated transport paths → headquarters, cloud, or control service. Evaluation evidence includes latency, jitter, loss, path selection, service continuity, policy state, and recovery timing.Energy · Slip-Routing + DEFTRemote site continuityVerified service path and review points01Remote Endlet02Protected DEFTservicerelationship03Continuouslyevaluatedtransport paths04Headquarters,cloud, orcontrol serviceEvaluation evidencelatency · jitter · lossEach control point and result is verified against the selected environment.

Primary capability

Slip-Routing + DEFT

How it works

Trace the protected service path from admission to evidence.

Keep remote operations connected through unstable last-mile and regional network conditions.

01

Establish identity and scope

Identify remote facilities, headquarters or cloud services, industrial edge Endlets, primary and alternate access networks; validate participating Endlets before admission.

02

Build the protected service path

remote Endlet → protected DEFT service relationship → continuously evaluated transport paths → headquarters, cloud, or control service

03

Capture decision evidence

Review latency, jitter, loss, path selection, service continuity with the responsible teams.

Architecture flow

Trace the protected service path and its control points.

01

remote Endlet

02

protected DEFT service relationship

03

continuously evaluated transport paths

04

headquarters, cloud, or control service

Inputs

remote facilities, headquarters or cloud services, industrial edge Endlets, primary and alternate access networks

Path

remote Endlet → protected DEFT service relationship → continuously evaluated transport paths → headquarters, cloud, or control service

Evidence

latency, jitter, loss, path selection, service continuity, policy state, and recovery timing

Quick answers

Remote site continuity FAQs

Which technical path should the team review?+

remote Endlet → protected DEFT service relationship → continuously evaluated transport paths → headquarters, cloud, or control service

Which evidence should reviewers collect?+

latency, jitter, loss, path selection, service continuity, policy state, and recovery timing

Who should review the architecture?+

field operations, network operations, OT security, service owners

Continue the evaluation path

Evaluate remote site continuity with a representative scope.

Determine whether critical remote services remain reachable during congestion, packet loss, and path-loss scenarios.

Continue to Evaluation